WELCOME TO OUR QLM.DIRECT LISTING
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO SCROLL DOWN THROUGH THE (6) SECTIONS BELOW.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
==========================
Company Name: Copeland Yussuf LLP
Address: 3 Borthwick St
City: London
State/Region: England
Postal Code: SE8 3GH
Country: GB
Website URL: http://www.copelandyussuf.com/
Phone: 020 3005 8660
Owner First Name:
Owner Last Name:
Year Started:
Employees:
Revenue Estimate:
Email: general@copelandyussuf.com
Website Type: WordPress 6.0.1
Blog: didn't find
Blog URL:
2. WEBSITE PERFORMANCE AND SECURITY:
==========================
Contact Form: found
How Fast Does This Their Website Load up
Desktop Site Load Time: 8.1
Mobile Site Load Time: 6.8
SSL Verified: SSL verified
3. SEO AND SOCIAL MEDIA CONNECTIONS
==========================
Video On Homepage: didn't find
Microformatscitation: didn't find
Click To Call on page: found
Facebook Connection: No
Google+ Connection: No
Pinterest Connection: No
YouTube Connection: No
Twitter Connection: No
Instagram Connection: No
Mobile Responsive: found
Mobile Optimized Site: found
Chatbot: not using a chatbot
Citations: 6
Keyword: Home Inspector Services Bromley, London
Ranking On The 1st Page: didn't find
Ranking On The Map: didn't find
1st Category: Chartered surveyor
Categories: Chartered surveyor
Google+ URL: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Copeland+Yussuf+LLP/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0x4a1be75c75d4b34d
Owner Verified: Yes
4. ONLINE REPUTATION AND MARKETING SCORE
==========================
Google Reviews #: 40
Google+ Score: 4.2
Google My Business Videos: 0
Top Maps Company: Precision Property Inspections
List of Competitors: Surveyors Services | Novello Chartered Surveyors- Fulham | Elementum Surveying Ltd. | AIS Surveyors Ltd trading as AIS Chartered Surveyors | Elysium Surveyors LLP | Harding Chartered Surveyors | Mullee Associates Limited
Google Bad Reviews #: 8
Google Reviewer 1, Name (Bad Review): James Barnard
Google Bad Review 1: Terrible service, was told valuation would be received in a week almost a month now and nothing, every time you call they promise the report will be ready by end of day but nothing !!
Google Reviewer 2, Name (Bad Review): Anim Ali
Google Bad Review (2): We used Copeland Yuusuf to value our shared ownership property for the purpose of obtaining an open market sales valuation.
Although the booking process was smooth and the communication was good, the valuation we received was very questionable.
We own a 25% share of the property which was purchased nearly 4 years ago, there have been significant improvements made including to the bathroom, installation of spotlights throughout, a new boiler, and redecoration throughout (in the last 6 months). according to the valuers valuation none of this was taken into account but instead they were only interested in what one local Estate Agent had to say about a property in the same block which is currently on the market however the property he referred to as a comparable was in its original state and located next to the entrance on the ground floor.
According to the valuation our property has increased just 2.7% in almost 4 years, when local statistics show the property market has grown almost 8% since we purchased our property and this does not take into account any improvements made to the property. I have also since found out that that another property in the block has been valued at £15 000 more that what we received.
I was never expecting an unrealistic sales price as i have worked in the Harrow property market for nearly 10 years so i have good knowledge of local prices and i have also since spoken to local agents to gather evidence as i will be reporting to the RICS.
I was hoping for a fair valuation but instead it seems the valuer has based his value on once conversation with an Agent for a property within the same block but still a completely different property just as you get properties on the same road which have vastly different valuations.
The valuation came back with comparable properties in the block next to us which was in fact an anomaly as i have found 3 properties which sold within the last year in the same block for at least £20 000 more than the comparable used. The other 2 comparable properties were not even comparable as they were £100 000 above the value of our flat. I am surprised that some of the properties used even made it into the report as it was like comparing a Ford to a Bentley. I will be checking with RICS about the use of comparables when I was found 7 more direct comparable properties which would be better suited as they are similar, more local and within a closer financial range.
I presented this information to the valuer on the phone who did not seem at all interested because he was so adamant in his valuation being correct and not even open to the possibility that the evidence i presented them with was something to take into consideration.
The valuer asked me to submit a form which allows me to submit evidence as to why i believe his valuation is wrong but at the same time told me that he wouldn't be changing his valuation. As this phone call was off my work mobile i have checked the recording to clarify this is what he said and it was the case. For a paying customer who paid on time i find this unacceptable as the valuer basically told me to submit the form but it wouldn't effect his valuation which would be a complete waste of my time.
I have done extensive research using Zoopla Pro & Rightmove Plus though my office to obtain sufficient data and evidence to confirm that the valuation conducted was undervalued.
Its a shame that even after presenting my evidence the valuer was not open to any change. He mentioned that other surveyors might be swayed by comparables if i was to present this to them at the valuation (the told me to try another surveyor), however this would just be presenting real world data and it shouldn't need to sway anyone when the evidence is in black and white.
The way in which i was dealt with and dismissed was completely unacceptable and i will be submitting my evidence to RICS as i am appalled that a regulated member acts in this way.
Google Good Reviews #: 31
Google Reviewer Name (Good Review): Abraham Peix
Google Good Review: From booking to the inspection visit, they were all friendly and helpful. I then had a desktop done with the same surveyor and that was done really quickly so we could complete in time.
Reviews last 30 Days: 3
Bad Review Percentage: 20%
Bad Reviews Top 10: 4
IP Bad Reviews #: 0
IP Bad Reviews:
YP Reviews #: 0
YP Bad Reviews #: 0
YP Bad Reviews:
Keywords In Homepage: 0
Website Backlinks: 0
Website Title: Copeland Yussuf Chartered Surveyors London
Keyword In Title: did not find
City In Title: did not find
Keyword Location: Home Inspector Services Bromley, London
Monthly Search Volume: 0
PPC Adwords Daily Budget($): 0
PPC Adwords Monthly Budget($): 0
Google Analytics: didn't find
Google Tag Manager: didn't find
FB Retargeting Pixel: did not find
Display Ad Retargeting: didn't find
5. DEALS AND SPECIAL OFFERS
==========================
Groupon Offer:
Groupon Offer Title:
Groupon Purchases:
Groupon Offer Expiration:
6. SOCIAL MEDIA ENGAGEMENT
==========================
Twitter Page URL:
Twitter ID:
Twitter Tweets #: 0
Twitter Followers #: 0
Twitter Likes #: 0
Facebook Page URL:
FB Likes #: 0
FB Followers #: 0
FB Posts In Last 30 Days:
FB Last Posted Days Ago:
FB Last Post Date:
FB Last Post Text:
FB Last Post Image:
FB Desktop Cover URL: did not find
SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNT COVER
Google+ Cover URL: https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/p/AF1QipP8RDvyRCII6JZ5yMO4Pu38bjjNFvJhmaLqIvfv=w374-h615-k-no
Youtube Cover URL: did not find
Twitter Cover URL: did not find
YouTube URL:
YouTube Subscribers: 0
YouTube Views: 0
YouTube Videos: 0
YouTube Video Search: found
Google Video Search: didn't find
Instagram URL:
Posts #:
Instagram Followers #:
Instagram ID:
Pinterest URL:
Pinterest Followers #: 0
Boards #: 0
Pins #: 0
Disclaimer.
The accuracy of this information was correct at the time of sourcing and may have changed online since the time of sourcing. QLM.Direct cannot guarantee that this information is currently Up-to-date and cannot be held responsible for any decisions made by the viewer on account of the information on this page.