Category: SW1A 1HD

WELCOME TO OUR QLM.DIRECT LISTING
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO SCROLL DOWN THROUGH THE (6) SECTIONS BELOW.

1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
==========================

Company Name:  Janes Solicitors

Address:  Cording House

City:   St. James's

State/Region:  London

Postal Code:  SW1A 1HD

Country:  GB

Website URL:  https://www.janes-solicitors.co.uk/

Phone:  020 7930 5100

Owner  First Name: 

Owner Last Name: 

Year Started:

Employees: 

Revenue Estimate: 

Email:  office@janes-solicitors.co.uk

Website Type:  Design and SEO by Moore Legal Technology

Blog:  found

Blog URL:  https://www.janes-solicitors.co.uk//components/com_easyblog/themes/simplistic/styles/style-5.2.4.min.css

 

2. WEBSITE PERFORMANCE AND SECURITY:
==========================

Contact Form:  didn't find

How Fast Does This Their Website Load up

Desktop Site Load Time:  1.1

Mobile Site Load Time:  0.6

SSL Verified:  SSL verified

 

3. SEO AND SOCIAL MEDIA CONNECTIONS
==========================

Video On Homepage:  didn't find

Microformatscitation:  didn't find

Click To Call on page: found

Facebook Connection:  No

Google+ Connection:  No

Pinterest Connection:  No

YouTube Connection:  No

Twitter Connection:  Yes

Instagram Connection:  No

Mobile Responsive:  found

Mobile Optimized Site:  found

Chatbot:  not using a chatbot

Citations:  27

Keyword:  Solicitor Camden, London

Ranking On The 1st Page:  didn't find

Ranking On The Map:  didn't find

1st Category:  Lawyer

Categories:  Lawyer,Barrister,Criminal defence lawyer,Law firm

Google+ URL:   https://www.google.com/maps/place/Janes+Solicitors/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0xc79f4aa3a18ece03

Owner Verified:  Yes

 

4. ONLINE REPUTATION AND MARKETING SCORE
==========================

Google Reviews #:  11

Google+ Score:  4.6

Google My Business Videos:  1

Top Maps Company:  Seraphus

List of Competitors:  Azrights Lawyers

Google Bad Reviews #:  1

Google Reviewer 1, Name (Bad Review):  Graham P

Google Bad Review 1:  After much searching I decided to retain Janes Solicitors, London, in connection with a historic allegation. I returned from France to the UK late October 2020 to defend this.

At the Magistrates Court representation was via a local affiliate who quite honestly was not up to the job – I could have argued my bail appeal better myself – all she did was read out what I had told her – no passion or persuasive manner whatsoever.

So…no bail. I was assured by Janes that if I had a UK address then Bail would have been granted…..but they provided zero assistance in obtaining accommodation, even though I
suggested employing a property company.

I subsequently was on remand for four months. During that time I put many questions and documents before Janes, to which there were very few answers/response. I went through all the written documents and ‘evidence’, and made my case against the allegations.

I constantly requested that they follow up issues raised – they did not.
I constantly reminded them that I did not wish to leave everything until the last few weeks to get resolved – but that is exactly what happened.

It was a very passive defence, simply responding to the CPS allegation rather than investigating further afield. Passive, not aggressive.

I was assured early on that they could work with my chosen Barrister…then a ‘faite accompli’ in that they chose a different one whom they had worked with before.

I was not introduced to my Barrister until about a month before the trial – one video meeting. Despite repeated requests, issues supporting the case were not followed up.

On the trial day itself I actually met my Barrister for the very first time in person.

Forty five minutes before the trial was due to start I was handed my defence proposal – the content of which was what I had written 6 months before – although not at all well formatted as my original was. My Barrister then informed me that the defence consisted of ‘conjecture’, and it would come down to ‘who the jury ‘liked’ the most.’’…..and suggested that it may be possible to agree a lesser sentence for a guilty plea.

Although I was not guilty I could not take the chance, and had to be pragmatic and expedient, so did as suggested so that I could return to my family in France with a nominal suspended sentence.

This is not what justice is supposed to be…and hey… to spring this on me 45 minutes before the trial was due to open – they had 6 months to say this………is that a correct way to act?

Janes were pleasant enough, and although I was on Legal Aid I was constantly assured I would be treated the same way as if privately funded. I cannot believe that was the case. Would I use them again – I cannot say that I would.

Google Reviewer 2, Name (Bad Review): 

Google Bad Review (2): 

Google Good Reviews #:  8

Google Reviewer Name (Good Review):  Bekir Berk

Google Good Review:  I went to Janes Solicitors today for the certification of DBS document. Solicitor Marc Livingston was very helpful.

Reviews last 30 Days:  1

Bad Review Percentage:  9%

Bad Reviews Top 10:  1

IP Bad Reviews #:  0

IP Bad Reviews: 

YP Reviews #:  0

YP Bad Reviews #:  0

YP Bad Reviews: 

Keywords In Homepage:  21

Website Backlinks:  0

Website Title:  Serious Fraud & Criminal Defence Solicitors London | Janes Solicitors

Keyword In Title:   did not find

City In Title:  did not find

Keyword Location:  Solicitor Camden, London

Monthly Search Volume:  0

PPC Adwords Daily Budget($):  0

PPC Adwords Monthly Budget($): 0

Google Analytics:  found

Google Tag Manager:  didn't find

FB Retargeting Pixel:  did not find

Display Ad Retargeting:  didn't find

 

5. DEALS AND SPECIAL OFFERS
==========================

Groupon Offer: 

Groupon Offer Title: 

Groupon Purchases: 

Groupon Offer Expiration: 

 

6. SOCIAL MEDIA ENGAGEMENT
==========================

Twitter Page URL:  https://twitter.com/JanesSolicitors

Twitter ID:  @JanesSolicitors

Twitter Tweets #:  338

Twitter Followers #:  1601

Twitter Likes #:  0

Facebook Page URL: 

FB Likes #:  0

FB Followers #:  0

FB Posts In Last 30 Days: 

FB Last Posted Days Ago: 

FB Last Post Date: 

FB Last Post Text: 

FB Last Post Image: 

FB Desktop Cover URL:  did not find

SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNT COVER

Google+ Cover URL:  https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/p/AF1QipPcOHt8S8D2nswr_yWrvFsO84q3CZBV0KljYG7x=w374-h615-k-no

Youtube Cover URL:  did not find

Twitter Cover URL:  https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_banners/244076784/1497016330/1500×500

YouTube URL: 

YouTube Subscribers:  0

YouTube Views:  0

YouTube Videos:  0

YouTube Video Search:  found

Google Video Search:  didn't find

Instagram URL: 

Posts #: 

Instagram Followers #: 

Instagram ID: 

Pinterest URL: 

Pinterest Followers #:  0

Boards #:  0

Pins #:  0

 

Disclaimer.

The accuracy of this information was correct at the time of sourcing and may have changed online since the time of sourcing. QLM.Direct cannot guarantee that this information is currently Up-to-date and cannot be held responsible for any decisions made by the viewer on account of the information on this page.

WELCOME TO OUR QLM.DIRECT LISTING
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO SCROLL DOWN THROUGH THE (6) SECTIONS BELOW.

1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
==========================

Company Name:  Janes Solicitors

Address:  Cording House

City:   St. James's

State/Region:  London

Postal Code:  SW1A 1HD

Country:  GB

Website URL:  https://www.janes-solicitors.co.uk/

Phone:  020 7930 5100

Owner  First Name: 

Owner Last Name: 

Year Started:

Employees: 

Revenue Estimate: 

Email:  office@janes-solicitors.co.uk

Website Type:  Design and SEO by Moore Legal Technology

Blog:  found

Blog URL:  https://www.janes-solicitors.co.uk//components/com_easyblog/themes/simplistic/styles/style-5.2.4.min.css

 

2. WEBSITE PERFORMANCE AND SECURITY:
==========================

Contact Form:  didn't find

How Fast Does This Their Website Load up

Desktop Site Load Time:  1.5

Mobile Site Load Time:  0.8

SSL Verified:  SSL verified

 

3. SEO AND SOCIAL MEDIA CONNECTIONS
==========================

Video On Homepage:  didn't find

Microformatscitation:  didn't find

Click To Call on page: found

Facebook Connection:  No

Google+ Connection:  No

Pinterest Connection:  No

YouTube Connection:  No

Twitter Connection:  Yes

Instagram Connection:  No

Mobile Responsive:  found

Mobile Optimized Site:  found

Chatbot:  not using a chatbot

Citations:  0

Keyword:  Lawyers Camden, London

Ranking On The 1st Page:  didn't find

Ranking On The Map:  didn't find

1st Category:  Lawyer

Categories:  Lawyer,Barrister,Criminal defence lawyer,Law firm

Google+ URL:   https://www.google.com/maps/place/Janes+Solicitors/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0xc79f4aa3a18ece03

Owner Verified:  Yes

 

4. ONLINE REPUTATION AND MARKETING SCORE
==========================

Google Reviews #:  11

Google+ Score:  4.6

Google My Business Videos:  1

Top Maps Company:  Seraphus

List of Competitors:  Azrights Lawyers | Commercial Property Solicitor St James's Park | Commlaws Law Firm | Branch Austin McCormick LLP

Google Bad Reviews #:  1

Google Reviewer 1, Name (Bad Review):  Graham P

Google Bad Review 1:  After much searching I decided to retain Janes Solicitors, London, in connection with a historic allegation. I returned from France to the UK late October 2020 to defend this.

At the Magistrates Court representation was via a local affiliate who quite honestly was not up to the job – I could have argued my bail appeal better myself – all she did was read out what I had told her – no passion or persuasive manner whatsoever.

So…no bail. I was assured by Janes that if I had a UK address then Bail would have been granted…..but they provided zero assistance in obtaining accommodation, even though I
suggested employing a property company.

I subsequently was on remand for four months. During that time I put many questions and documents before Janes, to which there were very few answers/response. I went through all the written documents and ‘evidence’, and made my case against the allegations.

I constantly requested that they follow up issues raised – they did not.
I constantly reminded them that I did not wish to leave everything until the last few weeks to get resolved – but that is exactly what happened.

It was a very passive defence, simply responding to the CPS allegation rather than investigating further afield. Passive, not aggressive.

I was assured early on that they could work with my chosen Barrister…then a ‘faite accompli’ in that they chose a different one whom they had worked with before.

I was not introduced to my Barrister until about a month before the trial – one video meeting. Despite repeated requests, issues supporting the case were not followed up.

On the trial day itself I actually met my Barrister for the very first time in person.

Forty five minutes before the trial was due to start I was handed my defence proposal – the content of which was what I had written 6 months before – although not at all well formatted as my original was. My Barrister then informed me that the defence consisted of ‘conjecture’, and it would come down to ‘who the jury ‘liked’ the most.’’…..and suggested that it may be possible to agree a lesser sentence for a guilty plea.

Although I was not guilty I could not take the chance, and had to be pragmatic and expedient, so did as suggested so that I could return to my family in France with a nominal suspended sentence.

This is not what justice is supposed to be…and hey… to spring this on me 45 minutes before the trial was due to open – they had 6 months to say this………is that a correct way to act?

Janes were pleasant enough, and although I was on Legal Aid I was constantly assured I would be treated the same way as if privately funded. I cannot believe that was the case. Would I use them again – I cannot say that I would.

Google Reviewer 2, Name (Bad Review): 

Google Bad Review (2): 

Google Good Reviews #:  8

Google Reviewer Name (Good Review):  Bekir Berk

Google Good Review:  I went to Janes Solicitors today for the certification of DBS document. Solicitor Marc Livingston was very helpful.

Reviews last 30 Days:  2

Bad Review Percentage:  9%

Bad Reviews Top 10:  1

IP Bad Reviews #:  0

IP Bad Reviews: 

YP Reviews #:  0

YP Bad Reviews #:  0

YP Bad Reviews: 

Keywords In Homepage:  3

Website Backlinks:  0

Website Title:  Serious Fraud & Criminal Defence Solicitors London | Janes Solicitors

Keyword In Title:   did not find

City In Title:  did not find

Keyword Location:  Lawyers Camden, London

Monthly Search Volume:  0

PPC Adwords Daily Budget($):  0

PPC Adwords Monthly Budget($): 0

Google Analytics:  found

Google Tag Manager:  didn't find

FB Retargeting Pixel:  did not find

Display Ad Retargeting:  didn't find

 

5. DEALS AND SPECIAL OFFERS
==========================

Groupon Offer: 

Groupon Offer Title: 

Groupon Purchases: 

Groupon Offer Expiration: 

 

6. SOCIAL MEDIA ENGAGEMENT
==========================

Twitter Page URL: 

Twitter ID: 

Twitter Tweets #: 

Twitter Followers #: 

Twitter Likes #: 

Facebook Page URL: 

FB Likes #: 

FB Followers #: 

FB Posts In Last 30 Days: 

FB Last Posted Days Ago: 

FB Last Post Date: 

FB Last Post Text: 

FB Last Post Image: 

FB Desktop Cover URL: 

SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNT COVER

Google+ Cover URL: 

Youtube Cover URL: 

Twitter Cover URL: 

YouTube URL: 

YouTube Subscribers: 

YouTube Views: 

YouTube Videos: 

YouTube Video Search: 

Google Video Search: 

Instagram URL: 

Posts #: 

Instagram Followers #: 

Instagram ID: 

Pinterest URL: 

Pinterest Followers #: 

Boards #: 

Pins #: 

 

Disclaimer.

The accuracy of this information was correct at the time of sourcing and may have changed online since the time of sourcing. QLM.Direct cannot guarantee that this information is currently Up-to-date and cannot be held responsible for any decisions made by the viewer on account of the information on this page.